![]() |
|||||||||||||||
San Diego Voters Quick Guide
|
|||||||||||||||
Election Year 2012 - Who is Least Likely to Make Things Worse? |
|||||||||||||||
Race for the White House 2012The choice is pretty clear. Mitt Romney believes that the poor, the working poor and the middle class should stop whining and work harder at being rich so the government can spend its time making the really rich even richer. If Romney wasn't in fear of sounding like a democrat he would be quoting JFK's famous "Ask not what your country can do for you... Instead he prefers the Mel Brook's imperial soliloquy as Louis XIV from History of the World Part I, "... fuck the poor." He believes war is a good economic stimulant - why not arm all the rebels in the Middle East and boost American jobs by making weapons of war and recruiting teenagers to lay down their lives for their Commander-in-Chief. And Mitt Romney believes that a constitutional amendment banning equal marriage protection for same sex couples is just what America needs to stop their escalating cry for equality. Constitutional subjugation will wake up the gay community and help them acknowledge that their lifestyle choices make them second class citizens. Perhaps then future numbers of homosexuals will decline and the straight and narrow will prevail. Romney refuses to admit that straight couples make gay babies and not by choice, but by chance and by science. Barrack Obama spent his first term reeling from the economic crisis brought on by 8 years of George W Bush with his reckless spending of trillions in the Middle East and 8 years of Bush economic advisors who apparently looked the other way as the rich took advantage of weak regulations in the mortgage industry and then cried... "Well, we didn't know." Now add the mid-term elections where the voting illiterate thought that giving the democrat in the white house a republican congress to do battle with better provided checks and balances. What it provided was political grid lock and once again we had screwed ourselves and we'll probably do it again on November 6. Obama has worked to give a more fair shake to the middle class while extending the safety net for the poor and extending health care opportunities for all Americans. He knew it wouldn't be politically popular but he also knew that the rich insurance companies, drug companies and power-house litigators who rail against tort reform would never do this on their own. And Obama doesn't believe that the federal government should decide who we can love and who we can marry but that the states should have the right to decide. While this doesn't open any doors for the opposing 44 states to champion equality it does incentivize the people to press their states into action. Gee I wonder if Romney has roots in the founding of America? I say that because our founding fathers were mostly slave owners who believed that women belonged at home, silent in the kitchen. But they did have a few good ideas and at the top of the list is the democratic ideal that the people determine their own fate equally under one rule of law. Loosely translated this means that you may stand up and be heard or sit quietly in the background and take what you get. It's our two party system that is responsible for denying us the abundance of opportunity our forefathers envisioned. It's got to be either the right or the left. Bipartisanism is becoming a 20th century cliché. How lovely it would be to take the best of both sides and put them together to make an American candidate. Please wave the flag here. |
|||||||||||||||
No New Taxes OR Tax Extensions Until |
|||||||||||||||
PROP 30 - Temporary Tax Increase - Hell NO |
|||||||||||||||
PROP 31 - Two Year Budget Cycle - NO |
|||||||||||||||
PROP 32 - Political Contibutions By Payroll Deduction - NO |
|||||||||||||||
PROP 33 - Auto Insurance Reform - Prices Based on Driver's History - NO |
|||||||||||||||
PROP 34 - End the Death Penalty in California YES
|
|||||||||||||||
PROP 35 - Human Trafficking Penalties - YES |
|||||||||||||||
PROP 36 -Three Strikes Law Revised- YES |
|||||||||||||||
PROP 37 -Genetically Engineered Food Labeling - NO The failure of this proposition is that is is too shallow and does little tp protect consumers. More far reaching is that growers will This proposal was apparently written by special interests and lacks sensible standards - in fact it lacks comprehensible standards. We should not vote for half-ass legislation like this. Yes the public thinks they want to have food products labeled when they contain genetically engineered "what"? With all the labeling laws we have now, including nutritional stickers on water, we still don't really know what's in the food we buy. When you walk into your favorite produce department can you tell which fruits and vegetables are covered with wax and know what kind of wax it is? Most likely not. And what's under the wax? Was the produce thoroughly washed before it was coated in the"safe and non-toxic" FDA approved petroluem product? What about Organic - the FDA allows organic foods to be coated in petroleum wax... and they might be accidentally contaminated by nearby genetically enginnered products... will they stilll be labeled organic and will they be labeled as "contaminated by GMO? Read the preface to the bill - it identifies that genetically modified foods can have dangerous health consequences, many of them yet unknown, yet the FDA allows them in our food supply, and has for several years. If you want to pass a bill that effects the potential safety of genetic engineering, lets force the FDA to require growers of genetically modified foods to do the safety research All the crap they put in processed foods and the stuff they allow growers to call wax on fruits and vegetables continues to be largely unknown. If you question a particular food, don't buy it and tell the seller to voluntarily label foods if he wants to sell them. This proposal will cost the tax payers too much money to regulate and enforce and not provide a better shopping opportunity. |
|||||||||||||||
PROP 38 -Tax Increase to Fund Education - Hell NO |
|||||||||||||||
PROP 39 - More Fairly Tax Multi state Businesses - YES |
|||||||||||||||
Prop 40 - Redistricting State Senate Districts - YES |
|||||||||||||||
PROP 41 -Mandatory Employee Start Times- Hell NO |
|||||||||||||||
San Diego Proposition Z - $2.8 Billion in New Bonds for School Repairs- Hell NO |
|||||||||||||||
No New Taxes OR Tax Extensions Until |
|||||||||||||||
Trump Endorses Mitt Romney - February 1, 2012
From a grandstanding 'press conference' at his luxurious Trump Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas, Romney stood beside the most pompous showman since P.T. Barnam and accepted his endorsement... or was it really just a very big plug for his moronic reality show. It’s just as well; Romney needs more conservative homophobes in his camp, people who are so concerned with their own wants and desires that concepts of equality become a threat to their burgeoning sense of power. Comparing civil equality for the GLBT community to using an ‘unattractive’ long putter, Trump surprised the world by announcing that he was a traditionalist and could never support same sex marriage. It will be interesting to watch how well Trump’s endorsement of Romney pays off. Perhaps Romney will just comb over this psychotic pat on the back... or could Trump be throwing his rump into the ring of running mate contenders. Nothing would surprise me this political season. |
|||||||||||||||
Homophobe of the Month - December 2011 Congratulations to Republican hopeless Rick Santorum for being elected as AndreAndTerry's Homophobe of the month for December, 2011. In his haste to demonstrate the right's unequivocal fear of American homosexuals, Rick Santorum insists that the only way to secure his agenda of social repression and bigotry is to press firmly for a constitutional amendment defining his vision of the proper social order for all Americans. How amusing, the Republican national agenda includes a fundmental need to reduce the size and influence of the federal government but the Santorum philosophy adds the need for a national referendum to once again take away our choices. A constitutional amendment will theoretically never happen but as long as people are allowed to vote for the prettiest face or the candidate most likely to give them just what they want with no regard for anyone else... all bets are off. The right's attempt to press for a federal mandate on this very public social issue demonstrates that age-old republican theme, 'the rich should rule the world and the rich should have everything their way'. Now sure how anyone posing for a picture like this one could win homophobe of the month but Rick Santorum certainly did. |
|||||||||||||||
A Wasted Life
|
|||||||||||||||
Homophobe of the Month - August 2011- Michele Bachmann Tired of sleepless nights worrying about the effect homosexuality is having on America? The Bachmann Clinic CAN CURE YOU with prayer and moderately priced counseling sessions. The Tea party is replete with those who believe that homosexuality is a choice and a product of social conditioning in spite of scores of clinical research to the contrary. Bachmann homophobia goes much deeper than the Bachmann Clinic where counselors are being told not to admit to their attempts to de-homosexualize fallen Christians as this will surely be a campaign issue going forward. Non Christians need not apply. Michele Bachmann's Christian right ideology, shared by a large number of wealthy Republicans, stands side by side with their book of God which apparently says ... |
|||||||||||||||
Homophobe of the Month - July 2011- Bob Vander Plaats Corn fed Christians rally with Bob Vander Plaats as they glorify God by disguising their fear of homosexuals in this amusing political diatribe called "The Marriage Vow." Threatening to only endorse Republican candidates that sign the vow the Family Leader organization did a great job in grabbing headlines and media attention to further their campaign against Americans right to choose. Aimed at bringing morale order to America by pretending to target the Weiners of Washington – no small task or pun intended – their primary agenda is a constitutional amendment that will deprive same sex couples of their right to marry the partner of their choice. Read the Vow and try not to vomit. This copy was the original one that GOP presidential hopefuls Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum signed. The first bullet point about slavery was then removed because of its absurd and inflammatory tone but not soon enough. It will be fun to watch these would-be politicians defend their choice to sign the Marriage Vow. |
|||||||||||||||
Marriage Equality - Slowly Sweeping America |
|||||||||||||||
World in Shock Over the Casey Anthony Verdict? |
|||||||||||||||










Donald Trump Endorses Mitt Romney, a move that no doubt annoyed the hell out of Newt Gingrich but then Donald has a way of rubbing people the wrong way. No doubt he got off telling Newt…”you’re fired.”


